Saturday, March 25, 2006
Politically Defused??
Now here is a subject that everyone talks about and in reality, no three people can agree on. I have been set to task, by a reader, on a subject that I have not given any thought too since High School Political Science class. So, here is what is already part of my recorded rantings so that the new readers can be as confused as my old readers are and then we shall all be confused equally.
Politics.
I was not going to enter into this so soon, but since I received an e-mail chastising my choice of political affiliation, this seems as good a time as any. Now I know I said not to be specific about subject matter for one of these little comments on life, but what the hell, I do believe I can answer his obscene comments without venturing too far from what I had already in mind for this subject. Oh yes, I was considering it all along. Why else would I include it in the opening commentary introducing this string of misbegotten, misshapened nonsense.
The e-mail also opened a couple other aspects of daily life which I shall wander back too another time as I see fit.
Now. May I introduce you folks to Oklahoma Political Science 101. I know this may extend the thinking on some folks, but no worries. Science will one day find a cure for Headis Uphis Buttkus.
Oklahoma, like many Southern states is prominently Democrat. But how can that be?? The Democrats wish too take our guns away!!!. Relax kids. Ours carry guns also. Besides, there is such more to be worried about then just our guns.
Then you have other facts to consider here. In 1978, there were only 6 registered Republicans in the precinct where I reside. Six verses just over four thousand Democrats. Currently that figure is something like a 60/40 split. Things do change ya know.
There is also the historical fact that generally speaking, Southern Democrats are Conservatives, not liberals. But Wait, you say!!!! What about the Billary's and Gore??? They are from the South!!!!!! Hey, don't get your panty hose in a wad here. Firstly I said 'generally speaking'. Secondly if you will think on it, you will remember that each of these individuals was educated in a Northern, Liberal University. If you need anymore data to fill in the blanks beyond that, forget it. I have other bones to pick here at the moment.
The Democratic Party is the Party of the Working Man. So goes the slogan. Man, what a load of foul smelling, bovine waste material. But hey dude, the Unions support Democratic Candidates all the time!!!! Yeah, and can we say Carter, Clinton, Gore?????
So we have the Democrats telling us how they are helping the poor working man in his battles against the evil factory owner who sets in his luxury home while we live in squallier. <> Can we spell Kennedy or Feinstien?? Just where the hell did their money come from. In fact, where does it still come from?? Well hell dude, investments!! Like hey man, so they invest in the same companies that they are protecting us from??
And all the time we are setting here, considering why I'm a Democrat. Kalifornia Welfare keeps paying out more in benefits to such a broad spectrum of clients that they have basically gone bankrupt, paying benefits that is greater then the income of many blue collar workers in other states, too include Kalifornia. Oh, have you noticed that Kalifornia is a hardcore Union, Democratic state??
Shall we discuss the aspects of LBJ's Great Society? Another Democrat with grand ideas. Ideas which is paid from the sweat of the very folks they claim to represent and protect.
Why am I a Democrat? It's all smoke and mirrors dude. Haven't you figured that out yet? Do I donate to the Democratic Party. Not in this lifetime!!! But interesting note here. Pay Union Dues and Support Al Gore.
Ok. Where has this headed. No where. Why?? Because it's really nobodies business how I vote. Besides, where is it written that I have to vote the Party Ticket??
And the idiot Democrats still cannot figure out how they can have a majority in voter
registration and still lose an election. Some days it's like betting two deuces against an Ace, King, Queen showing on the table.
Have you figured it out yet? I do hope so. And as far as Oklahoma Political Science 101 is concerned. It's no different then any place else, except we usually know the crook we are electing instead of one that may steal more then the last politician in office.
11 Sept 2003
Kellyville, OK
Politics Part 1
We all play politics in one form or another. It is just a fact of life. How we play the game often shows in how we succeed in life. No one in immune and no one can survive without becoming involved. If anyone has a problem understanding what I just said, no worries. You will graduate kindergarten soon.
Politicians. Often we base our political choice on the type of politics our elected officials play. Liberals, Moderates, Conservatives. It seems that over the past decade there are only two choices: Left Wing Liberal and Right Wing Conservatives. Nope. Those are just the ones that get all the press.
Note: Ed Asner of Lou Grant fame recently stated that he fully believes in the Communist format. That makes him so far to the Left he fell off the map.
Interesting thing about most of the Left Wing Liberals you hear about in the news. None of them are poor and down trodden. They spout slogans about helping the poor and down trodden and yet, notice the pause here folks, it has came to public knowledge they give less to charity then the evil Conservatives do.
But where do they get their money from? Manna from heaven? Nope, from the same folks they claim are sorely against the working man improving himself.
How can a person work so hard to gain riches then shoot off their mouth about the wealthy in this country?
Note: Weatherman Faction of the Students for a Democratic Society. Remember these folks? I once had physical contact with them as a Marine MP. Interesting aspect of this group is they came from a privileged class. Wealthy. They went forth and fought the battle for the underprivileged. Blowing up College Research facilities, blowing up Draft Boards, and being a real royal pain in the ass. Terrorists. Terrorists with Fat Daddy's Credit Cards in their pocket. Politics. 1960's style.
Moderates: Well, these folks swing both ways when need be. And to be honest. This is a good thing. These folks are just trying to keep the train on the track and on time.
Conservatives. Well, it depends on where you are at in the midst of all this to determine which flavor of conservative you may be. But this also holds true for Liberals and Moderates.
Myself?? Well, I like to say that I am a Liberally Moderated Conservative. Now, if you can figure that one out, then you only think you have a handle on my politics.
It's alright to have a dissenting view. It's what makes the world go thump when you hit a speed bump. But the real crime is to hold harsh feelings against another because of them. Have you noticed over the past few years how certain Liberal Politicians criticize the Conservative ones with vigor, but when they themselves get commented on even in the most gentle ways, they are screaming how abused and mistreated they are?
Oh, we can carry this discussion on forever. But I have smaller fish to fry.
Question: During the 60's, Republicans were commonly Liberal and Democrats were commonly Conservative. Liberals were basically a 'live and let live' type of folks, where Conservatives were hardliners to the max. When did all this change?? Did I take a long nap or something?
Hell, I'll let you folks figure it out. On too the next confusion.
Voting: Simple here. If you do not vote, I do not even want to hear any complaints about politicians or their policies. I did not travel half way around the world, nearly get myself killed defending the theory I was protecting the rights of the people to take part in the political process. Vote or keep your mouth shout. You lost the right to complain when you decided not to vote.
And as Nick Fury used to say; "Nuff Said".
12 Sept 2003
Kellyville, OK
Politics Part 2
I promised myself when starting this to never reveal anyone’s name that contributed to this series. No need to go back on that now. When I say contribute, I mean those that in many ways have either prompted these, made suggestions, or somehow planted the seed of mischief into my warped mind. And then you have several really demented insults planted in my mind for usage later in one of these commentaries which I shall not specify.
It is important to remember that I am not politically correct in more ways then anyone can count. Therefore, having announced that, be aware just because I say, 'he', do not think it is a male that I am referencing. And if I use the words he or she in the same paragraph in a descriptive manner, I can very well be referring to the same person. This is so you, the reader, can feel that I am not referring to you in general. Or you can think I am commenting on your sexual preference. The choice is yours.
NOW..... to get onto more confusing things. You will find a Web Site URL at the end of today's yammerings. And I know that several of the folks receiving this has already seen it and have taken the test. Whoa!!!... A Test! Dude, I didn't know we had a test today!!! Relax, set back and enjoy.
Several comments about today's renderings of "How The World Flops". This test is called "The Political Compass". It is an interesting test designed to give an individual an idea where they are in the political arena. It has several flaws built into it. Now I am certain that the designers were trying to keep it as simple as possible, but have failed miserably.
Most of the questions are black and white in content, without the normal shades of gray which inhabit today's life. This can produce a somewhat misguided response. Now for those that have already taken the test, I wish you will consider that possibility that your position on the chart at the end of the test is guided not so much by your answers, but by the designers of the test. How far it may shift your position is unknown since I have had zero part in developing the test.
One major factor here. I've seen some of these questions before. This test was designed by students of a social science with specific leanings. I know I am talking gibberish at this moment, but then again, why change my habits. Look at the questions. Then look at the answers. They are designed to give specific responses regardless of true beliefs. If any single question was shaded lightly gray, your answer would be different then the one you have or will choose. If a 5th choice of an answer was given, such as, "I Have no feelings on this", again your answers would change. Change either part and your position on the chart would move dramatically.
OK. Now I have given my unqualified comments on said test. Now, I'd like to make a suggestion. Take the test more then once. I do not mean take it then 30 minutes later, take it again. I took the test late in the evening and then again at 0700 nearly 36 hours later. Big shift in plotting. Why? Beats the crap out of me. But it may have to do with the problems of the day we encounter. We are influenced hourly by the actions of the world around us. First thing in the morning we have less social interactions that can cause a shift in our decisions, where as by late afternoon we are fed up with the world and just about hate everything.
And one final note here. If you do not like the position on the chart you find yourself, you can keep taking the test until you find that place you believe you are in. But note that if you keep track of your answers, you may find yourself in a place that you really do not wish to be in. Lie on the test if you want, just do not lie to yourself.
BTW. I really have no interest in where you find yourself on the chart. Take the test if you choose or not.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/
29 Sept 2003
Sapulpa, OK
Politics 2.5
Well, I did say there were some strange things with that test. Some of the questions were a tad ambiguous were they not?
Now if I was a betting man, I'd speculate that somewhere in the future, those two dudes that designed the test will publish a paper using the results of said test. And Political Scientists all over the world will jump to the same conclusion that this is how the public really is in the political arena. Advisors will be telling their clients that based on a sampling, the public desires these things to happen. Politicians will be passing laws and telling their constituents how hard they are working to bring forth their wishes.
Actually, if anyone just got upset about the possibility mentioned above, just relax and take a deep breath. That test may give some indication to the political leanings of a random sampling world wide, but it is hardly something to be used by any single politician to base his programs on. Now a Political Party is another thing. But then again, no worries. If you looked closely at the questions you find there are already laws impacting each question.
Then there is the factor that the test was conducted on the World Wide Web, which is no guarantee that the subjects taking the test were of legal voting age or even sane. Add in that you have so many random variables to factor in that as a sampling of voters it is worthless.
BUT....... yeah, I know. There is always a but. For those folks that believe in the rights of the individual based on the Bill of Rights, may I suggest you go back thru the test. Look at each question very carefully. Remember how you voted on each question. Then consider just how your answer conflicts with your core beliefs of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Oh man I did it now!!!! I've asked folks to question their beliefs.
Look. I'm not out to change the world here. I'm not out to change any single individual reading this mess of nonsense. What, if anything, I'm trying to do is make folks aware that regardless of how simple, how innocent any of these tests are. They can't be trusted. Which takes me to the next part.
Who the hell decided the placement of George Bush, Tony Blair, Saddam Hussein, and the other folks on that chart? Gee, I'm certain those folks took the test themselves!!!!! Then you have the value of each answer to factor in. Without a neutral answer there is no real way to achieve a Zero position. In other words, there is no Mean position in the test. Mean is needed to verify the accuracy of any test.
Remember what I said in Politics Part 1 about the Moderates. They are your Mean. And in a real sense they are left out of this test and the ability to qualify in this test. They are the balance point.
Ok... where are we at here? This test was developed by a couple of folks who seem to know their stuff for sure. And was sponsored for a specific purpose. Whether this purpose concerns us or not is not all that important. What is important is that someone with more money then sense has developed a test, put it on a website and is collecting data. Why? Hell, do I look like a crystal ball??
But deep within the recesses of my warped, demented mind comes a grand idea. Take the test as many times as you wish. Think of it as a game. And never complete the test the same way twice. Vote against your grain. If any data is being collected here, then actions such as that will totally screw up their results.
Remember, a Mime is a terrible thing to waste.
30 Sept 2003
Sapulpa, OK
Post Script: The above ramblings were brought too you by the folks of Pleasant Manor Retirement Home and Insane Asylum. Where nothing is real and the walrus was Paul.
Politics Part 3
California has a new governor. Guess this has stuck in the throat of many folks around the country. And if you go to Slate.com, you will be able to see some of the thinking around the country in Political Cartoons.
I did read a comment from a 25 year old lady from Berkley. She was accusing the Republicans of trying to take over the state. At this point, anything I may wish too say, would place me in an awkward position of sounding like a redneck.
Did anyone find it strange that until Schwarzeneggar became a real contender for the Governor’s job, that no mention of any mishandling of the ladies had surfaced before hand? Again, trip over to Slate. There you can find cartoonists who in a real sense tried and convicted the man of a crime he was only accused of.
Now, having caught a few heavy sound bites from last nights Democratic Debates, I believe that the muck and mud that was being slung in California, shall be the theme for next years election. Hip wadders for everyone!!
Interesting note: One article found on MSNBC has given the new Governor the name; Arnold “Teflon” Schwarzeneggar.
Only time will tell on how this will all play out. But I think folks should just set back and watch the action. Seriously, how much more damage can an Actor do to the State of Kalifornia, then has already been by schooled politicians? And like he is not the first actor to fill the job. Remember the last one? We called him President for eight years!
Well, I’m going to take a nap before starting work this morning. And besides, after the last edition of Human Relations, I’m certain some of you need a break.
Have a splendid weekend.
10 Oct 2003
Sapulpa, OK
Politics Part 4:
Well now, we have a governor elect in California that was not born a U.S. Citizen. Without doing major research, I would say this is the first time in 200 years that has happened. If not longer. It will be interesting to watch how this progresses over the next few months.
If you have also noticed, several unions have been really starting crap out there since the election. Also notice that the unions supported Grey Davis during this recall election. I wonder if they would have been so vocal or pronounced if Davis had beaten the recall vote?
As I said earlier, we all play politics in one manner or another. Some call it ‘Brown Nosing’, while others call it kissing ass. Choice of wording only depends on which end you be on, or if you are the one being left out in the cold.
We watched Bill Clinton kiss up to several minority groups during his first campaign for the White House with nearly tragic results. One example is that there have been homosexuals within the US Military probably since 1775. But unless those folks did something blatant to expose themselves or endanger the service, they were largely ignored. Clinton opened a bag of worms and nearly tore the US Military apart at the time. All for the sake of a few votes.
Of course, it is not a secret that Hillary hates the military with a passion. Maybe it is because she recognizes that even though the President commands the military, they never really control them.
But now matter where a person goes, he will see politics in action. Whether it is a Union meeting, a Lodge meeting or even an Internet chat room. Cliques are formed and someone always feels left out. Sometimes the cliques are quiet, docile and unobtrusive. While other times they take control, and dominate. I have always considered the latter to be made up of folks whom are weak in spirit and without moral courage on their own. But in a group, they feel empowered. Bullies, if you wish for a better term.
So. What was the purpose of today’s tidbit of diatribe? You figure it out. I’m too tired to think on it.
20 Oct 03
Sapulpa, OK
Political Fear
Some aspects of politics are harder then others. Often a single person finds themselves at odds with people they call friends. And is this frame of thinking I am reminded of something I heard years ago.
“A friend understands the differences in his friends, where a good friend recognizes the differences and is not ashamed to point out when a friend is wrong.”
Now I have to admit I am ashamed of myself for not speaking my mind once I realized there was something I considered wrong. Remember, the phrase ‘I considered wrong’, cause this is always important in any relationship.
Even after 33 years of marriage I must recognize that there are things in which my bride and I shall never agree upon. But the good thing is that we can discuss those things without fear of bloodshed or sleeping alone. What does this have to do with these and other comments today? Not a thing except to fill some space and hopefully bring a few things into focus.
Now I have never understood why or how people develop intense hate of a candidate for public office. Especially one they have never had physical contact with. Where does those feelings come from? How do they develop into such an intensity, that you would think the candidate had kicked the persons dog or something more sinister.
My Bride and I had discussed this on several occasions, without coming to any specific conclusions worth discussing here. But one thread kept coming up which maybe, just maybe requires some examination.
Fear.
Yet we cannot seem to understand where the fear comes from. Why a person so fears another they become so intense they refuse to see reason. Or at least cannot see reason. But the reasons for such fears completely allude me.
Now I am aware just how much can change by the election of a single person, but also understand that things cannot change only by a single person. What we observed during the Clinton Administration was persons taking advantage of Clinton’s political beliefs and playing them for their own gains. We watched some things go from simple to confused. Political Correctness where a single individual could dictate actions over a large portion of this country.
Interesting note: Federal Laws pertaining to the building of Playgrounds with Federal Funds. One law requires specific safety substances around and under playground equipment for the protection of the children utilizing them. Hey, this is actually a great law. Accidents do happen on the playground, especially at swings and such, and a soft place to land can save a child from weeks of painful healing.
Another Federal Law requires that any Federally Funded activity be Handicapped Accessible. This puts it at odds with the Law mentioned above, because the substances specified for safety are such that a wheelchair cannot transverse to the swing or slide it is under and around. So what you have is a Playground with very few if any activities in which both the Handicapped and mobile child can use.
Now I am a firm believer in that every child should be able to enjoy a playground. But I think it is criminal to eliminate a single playground activity cause less then 10 percent of the local usage will be Handicapped. This puts things in a minority rule situation. This means it is possible that 99 kids cannot enjoy activities we did as children cause 1 child has the unfortunate situation of being Handicapped. This is not being Politically Correct, this is being criminally negligent by those we depend on protecting all of us.
Besides, Kids tend to take care of things. And unless the Handicapped child is a real jerk, other kids will find a way for him or her to enjoy the activities they may not be able to get right up next too. Also, let’s figure out what moron determined the wheel chair has to get close enough to a swing so the child can move from it to a swing. Did he also consider what will happen to the wheelchair afterwards? It sure cannot stay next to the swing or the child will find himself damaging it and himself fairly soon after the swing action starts. OH… wait… someone will move it out of the way. Yeah… and why couldn’t that same person carry the child to the swing in the first place?
OK… I’ve beat that about some. Just consider before you fire a shot at me, that I am a Grandparent. I’m not Politically Correct and don’t give me any ammunition to fire back at you.
Now, back to the reason why people hate so much again. Anyone have a thought on it? You do? Great, share it with us here. But consider this, I am not bashful in playing the Devil’s Advocate.
What worried me most about this past week’s election was not so much who won but the actions or reactions of those felt the election was not in their liking.
There are websites popping up all over the place claiming Bush stole this election also. Much in the same manner he was supposed to have stole the first one. Here is a thought. If anyone other then a Bush had been governor of Florida the first time around, then I doubt if the controversy would have been so intense over the outcome. But if you read enough websites you will find much of the same gibberish concerning the outcome of the Ohio results. Also the concern over electronic voting keeps popping up with people claiming Kerry had more votes but the electronic system kept deleting votes for him, thus giving Bush the election.
This goes back to the comments earlier in the year that is was Republicans who owned the companies that made the machines. Does it take into consideration that maybe not all of the employees were Republican? Just how many people do you have to threaten or bribe before you can keep a conspiracy quiet?
Give it a break people. We have watched aides to Congressmen and Senators leak out information for years. This does not discount the people within the various departments of government who has made sure documents best left in their desks get in the hands of the news people. Do you really think if someone sabotaged the election, it would not get out to ABC News?
So what are people so afraid of that they develop such a hatred for a specific person running for public office? Fear that their way of life will change forever? Certainly it will change. Even if their candidate wins, it can change in a manner which they never anticipated. Kind of reminds you of the old saying, “Be careful what your wish for; You may get it”.
Also came up the concept of guilt. A person may feel guilt about their life actions and feels that the public person they hate reminds them they are not the perfect person they would like to be. Ok… I’m keeping things simplistic, but then again, it has been way too many years since I was in my college Psychology and Sociology classes and since they were not in my actual major, hard to remember all the special terms and phrases they love to use to describe a persons or groups actions. I took an “A” in the classes, which was all that was important to me anyway.
What I would like for anyone reading this to do, is to set down and list exactly why the have such strong feelings. No need to list them as a comment to this, but for themselves. I seriously doubt anyone who stumbles on this blog is of the mental state they are not able to rationalize and reason through such feelings.
But here is something I have heard several times and read once or twice that I feel is important to understand. This is the concept of voting against one person instead of voting for the other. Make sense? Let me flesh it out some. A political pollster commented on television that according to his figures only 17% of the Kerry voters were actually voting for Kerry, where as the other 83% were voting against Bush. Now what kind of sense does that make to elect a President based purely on the dislike of one candidate? I mean I did not trust or like Kerry. I do not believe he was the man for the job, but I voted For Bush not Against Kerry. Now I do not agree with everything Bush believes in nor do I agree with all of his decisions and policies, but I do believe he is the man for the job at this time in our history. But that is just my opinion, which like anal orifices, everyone has one and they mostly stink.
And for those who receive notification of each publication I make, I apologize for not having the comment blanks available for responses. I am still learning this system and shall endeavor to insure the proper box is checked so if you desire to make a response directly to the Blog site you can.
8 November 2004
Politics.
I was not going to enter into this so soon, but since I received an e-mail chastising my choice of political affiliation, this seems as good a time as any. Now I know I said not to be specific about subject matter for one of these little comments on life, but what the hell, I do believe I can answer his obscene comments without venturing too far from what I had already in mind for this subject. Oh yes, I was considering it all along. Why else would I include it in the opening commentary introducing this string of misbegotten, misshapened nonsense.
The e-mail also opened a couple other aspects of daily life which I shall wander back too another time as I see fit.
Now. May I introduce you folks to Oklahoma Political Science 101. I know this may extend the thinking on some folks, but no worries. Science will one day find a cure for Headis Uphis Buttkus.
Oklahoma, like many Southern states is prominently Democrat. But how can that be?? The Democrats wish too take our guns away!!!. Relax kids. Ours carry guns also. Besides, there is such more to be worried about then just our guns.
Then you have other facts to consider here. In 1978, there were only 6 registered Republicans in the precinct where I reside. Six verses just over four thousand Democrats. Currently that figure is something like a 60/40 split. Things do change ya know.
There is also the historical fact that generally speaking, Southern Democrats are Conservatives, not liberals. But Wait, you say!!!! What about the Billary's and Gore??? They are from the South!!!!!! Hey, don't get your panty hose in a wad here. Firstly I said 'generally speaking'. Secondly if you will think on it, you will remember that each of these individuals was educated in a Northern, Liberal University. If you need anymore data to fill in the blanks beyond that, forget it. I have other bones to pick here at the moment.
The Democratic Party is the Party of the Working Man. So goes the slogan. Man, what a load of foul smelling, bovine waste material. But hey dude, the Unions support Democratic Candidates all the time!!!! Yeah, and can we say Carter, Clinton, Gore?????
So we have the Democrats telling us how they are helping the poor working man in his battles against the evil factory owner who sets in his luxury home while we live in squallier. <
And all the time we are setting here, considering why I'm a Democrat. Kalifornia Welfare keeps paying out more in benefits to such a broad spectrum of clients that they have basically gone bankrupt, paying benefits that is greater then the income of many blue collar workers in other states, too include Kalifornia. Oh, have you noticed that Kalifornia is a hardcore Union, Democratic state??
Shall we discuss the aspects of LBJ's Great Society? Another Democrat with grand ideas. Ideas which is paid from the sweat of the very folks they claim to represent and protect.
Why am I a Democrat? It's all smoke and mirrors dude. Haven't you figured that out yet? Do I donate to the Democratic Party. Not in this lifetime!!! But interesting note here. Pay Union Dues and Support Al Gore.
Ok. Where has this headed. No where. Why?? Because it's really nobodies business how I vote. Besides, where is it written that I have to vote the Party Ticket??
And the idiot Democrats still cannot figure out how they can have a majority in voter
registration and still lose an election. Some days it's like betting two deuces against an Ace, King, Queen showing on the table.
Have you figured it out yet? I do hope so. And as far as Oklahoma Political Science 101 is concerned. It's no different then any place else, except we usually know the crook we are electing instead of one that may steal more then the last politician in office.
11 Sept 2003
Kellyville, OK
Politics Part 1
We all play politics in one form or another. It is just a fact of life. How we play the game often shows in how we succeed in life. No one in immune and no one can survive without becoming involved. If anyone has a problem understanding what I just said, no worries. You will graduate kindergarten soon.
Politicians. Often we base our political choice on the type of politics our elected officials play. Liberals, Moderates, Conservatives. It seems that over the past decade there are only two choices: Left Wing Liberal and Right Wing Conservatives. Nope. Those are just the ones that get all the press.
Note: Ed Asner of Lou Grant fame recently stated that he fully believes in the Communist format. That makes him so far to the Left he fell off the map.
Interesting thing about most of the Left Wing Liberals you hear about in the news. None of them are poor and down trodden. They spout slogans about helping the poor and down trodden and yet, notice the pause here folks, it has came to public knowledge they give less to charity then the evil Conservatives do.
But where do they get their money from? Manna from heaven? Nope, from the same folks they claim are sorely against the working man improving himself.
How can a person work so hard to gain riches then shoot off their mouth about the wealthy in this country?
Note: Weatherman Faction of the Students for a Democratic Society. Remember these folks? I once had physical contact with them as a Marine MP. Interesting aspect of this group is they came from a privileged class. Wealthy. They went forth and fought the battle for the underprivileged. Blowing up College Research facilities, blowing up Draft Boards, and being a real royal pain in the ass. Terrorists. Terrorists with Fat Daddy's Credit Cards in their pocket. Politics. 1960's style.
Moderates: Well, these folks swing both ways when need be. And to be honest. This is a good thing. These folks are just trying to keep the train on the track and on time.
Conservatives. Well, it depends on where you are at in the midst of all this to determine which flavor of conservative you may be. But this also holds true for Liberals and Moderates.
Myself?? Well, I like to say that I am a Liberally Moderated Conservative. Now, if you can figure that one out, then you only think you have a handle on my politics.
It's alright to have a dissenting view. It's what makes the world go thump when you hit a speed bump. But the real crime is to hold harsh feelings against another because of them. Have you noticed over the past few years how certain Liberal Politicians criticize the Conservative ones with vigor, but when they themselves get commented on even in the most gentle ways, they are screaming how abused and mistreated they are?
Oh, we can carry this discussion on forever. But I have smaller fish to fry.
Question: During the 60's, Republicans were commonly Liberal and Democrats were commonly Conservative. Liberals were basically a 'live and let live' type of folks, where Conservatives were hardliners to the max. When did all this change?? Did I take a long nap or something?
Hell, I'll let you folks figure it out. On too the next confusion.
Voting: Simple here. If you do not vote, I do not even want to hear any complaints about politicians or their policies. I did not travel half way around the world, nearly get myself killed defending the theory I was protecting the rights of the people to take part in the political process. Vote or keep your mouth shout. You lost the right to complain when you decided not to vote.
And as Nick Fury used to say; "Nuff Said".
12 Sept 2003
Kellyville, OK
Politics Part 2
I promised myself when starting this to never reveal anyone’s name that contributed to this series. No need to go back on that now. When I say contribute, I mean those that in many ways have either prompted these, made suggestions, or somehow planted the seed of mischief into my warped mind. And then you have several really demented insults planted in my mind for usage later in one of these commentaries which I shall not specify.
It is important to remember that I am not politically correct in more ways then anyone can count. Therefore, having announced that, be aware just because I say, 'he', do not think it is a male that I am referencing. And if I use the words he or she in the same paragraph in a descriptive manner, I can very well be referring to the same person. This is so you, the reader, can feel that I am not referring to you in general. Or you can think I am commenting on your sexual preference. The choice is yours.
NOW..... to get onto more confusing things. You will find a Web Site URL at the end of today's yammerings. And I know that several of the folks receiving this has already seen it and have taken the test. Whoa!!!... A Test! Dude, I didn't know we had a test today!!! Relax, set back and enjoy.
Several comments about today's renderings of "How The World Flops". This test is called "The Political Compass". It is an interesting test designed to give an individual an idea where they are in the political arena. It has several flaws built into it. Now I am certain that the designers were trying to keep it as simple as possible, but have failed miserably.
Most of the questions are black and white in content, without the normal shades of gray which inhabit today's life. This can produce a somewhat misguided response. Now for those that have already taken the test, I wish you will consider that possibility that your position on the chart at the end of the test is guided not so much by your answers, but by the designers of the test. How far it may shift your position is unknown since I have had zero part in developing the test.
One major factor here. I've seen some of these questions before. This test was designed by students of a social science with specific leanings. I know I am talking gibberish at this moment, but then again, why change my habits. Look at the questions. Then look at the answers. They are designed to give specific responses regardless of true beliefs. If any single question was shaded lightly gray, your answer would be different then the one you have or will choose. If a 5th choice of an answer was given, such as, "I Have no feelings on this", again your answers would change. Change either part and your position on the chart would move dramatically.
OK. Now I have given my unqualified comments on said test. Now, I'd like to make a suggestion. Take the test more then once. I do not mean take it then 30 minutes later, take it again. I took the test late in the evening and then again at 0700 nearly 36 hours later. Big shift in plotting. Why? Beats the crap out of me. But it may have to do with the problems of the day we encounter. We are influenced hourly by the actions of the world around us. First thing in the morning we have less social interactions that can cause a shift in our decisions, where as by late afternoon we are fed up with the world and just about hate everything.
And one final note here. If you do not like the position on the chart you find yourself, you can keep taking the test until you find that place you believe you are in. But note that if you keep track of your answers, you may find yourself in a place that you really do not wish to be in. Lie on the test if you want, just do not lie to yourself.
BTW. I really have no interest in where you find yourself on the chart. Take the test if you choose or not.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/
29 Sept 2003
Sapulpa, OK
Politics 2.5
Well, I did say there were some strange things with that test. Some of the questions were a tad ambiguous were they not?
Now if I was a betting man, I'd speculate that somewhere in the future, those two dudes that designed the test will publish a paper using the results of said test. And Political Scientists all over the world will jump to the same conclusion that this is how the public really is in the political arena. Advisors will be telling their clients that based on a sampling, the public desires these things to happen. Politicians will be passing laws and telling their constituents how hard they are working to bring forth their wishes.
Actually, if anyone just got upset about the possibility mentioned above, just relax and take a deep breath. That test may give some indication to the political leanings of a random sampling world wide, but it is hardly something to be used by any single politician to base his programs on. Now a Political Party is another thing. But then again, no worries. If you looked closely at the questions you find there are already laws impacting each question.
Then there is the factor that the test was conducted on the World Wide Web, which is no guarantee that the subjects taking the test were of legal voting age or even sane. Add in that you have so many random variables to factor in that as a sampling of voters it is worthless.
BUT....... yeah, I know. There is always a but. For those folks that believe in the rights of the individual based on the Bill of Rights, may I suggest you go back thru the test. Look at each question very carefully. Remember how you voted on each question. Then consider just how your answer conflicts with your core beliefs of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Oh man I did it now!!!! I've asked folks to question their beliefs.
Look. I'm not out to change the world here. I'm not out to change any single individual reading this mess of nonsense. What, if anything, I'm trying to do is make folks aware that regardless of how simple, how innocent any of these tests are. They can't be trusted. Which takes me to the next part.
Who the hell decided the placement of George Bush, Tony Blair, Saddam Hussein, and the other folks on that chart? Gee, I'm certain those folks took the test themselves!!!!! Then you have the value of each answer to factor in. Without a neutral answer there is no real way to achieve a Zero position. In other words, there is no Mean position in the test. Mean is needed to verify the accuracy of any test.
Remember what I said in Politics Part 1 about the Moderates. They are your Mean. And in a real sense they are left out of this test and the ability to qualify in this test. They are the balance point.
Ok... where are we at here? This test was developed by a couple of folks who seem to know their stuff for sure. And was sponsored for a specific purpose. Whether this purpose concerns us or not is not all that important. What is important is that someone with more money then sense has developed a test, put it on a website and is collecting data. Why? Hell, do I look like a crystal ball??
But deep within the recesses of my warped, demented mind comes a grand idea. Take the test as many times as you wish. Think of it as a game. And never complete the test the same way twice. Vote against your grain. If any data is being collected here, then actions such as that will totally screw up their results.
Remember, a Mime is a terrible thing to waste.
30 Sept 2003
Sapulpa, OK
Post Script: The above ramblings were brought too you by the folks of Pleasant Manor Retirement Home and Insane Asylum. Where nothing is real and the walrus was Paul.
Politics Part 3
California has a new governor. Guess this has stuck in the throat of many folks around the country. And if you go to Slate.com, you will be able to see some of the thinking around the country in Political Cartoons.
I did read a comment from a 25 year old lady from Berkley. She was accusing the Republicans of trying to take over the state. At this point, anything I may wish too say, would place me in an awkward position of sounding like a redneck.
Did anyone find it strange that until Schwarzeneggar became a real contender for the Governor’s job, that no mention of any mishandling of the ladies had surfaced before hand? Again, trip over to Slate. There you can find cartoonists who in a real sense tried and convicted the man of a crime he was only accused of.
Now, having caught a few heavy sound bites from last nights Democratic Debates, I believe that the muck and mud that was being slung in California, shall be the theme for next years election. Hip wadders for everyone!!
Interesting note: One article found on MSNBC has given the new Governor the name; Arnold “Teflon” Schwarzeneggar.
Only time will tell on how this will all play out. But I think folks should just set back and watch the action. Seriously, how much more damage can an Actor do to the State of Kalifornia, then has already been by schooled politicians? And like he is not the first actor to fill the job. Remember the last one? We called him President for eight years!
Well, I’m going to take a nap before starting work this morning. And besides, after the last edition of Human Relations, I’m certain some of you need a break.
Have a splendid weekend.
10 Oct 2003
Sapulpa, OK
Politics Part 4:
Well now, we have a governor elect in California that was not born a U.S. Citizen. Without doing major research, I would say this is the first time in 200 years that has happened. If not longer. It will be interesting to watch how this progresses over the next few months.
If you have also noticed, several unions have been really starting crap out there since the election. Also notice that the unions supported Grey Davis during this recall election. I wonder if they would have been so vocal or pronounced if Davis had beaten the recall vote?
As I said earlier, we all play politics in one manner or another. Some call it ‘Brown Nosing’, while others call it kissing ass. Choice of wording only depends on which end you be on, or if you are the one being left out in the cold.
We watched Bill Clinton kiss up to several minority groups during his first campaign for the White House with nearly tragic results. One example is that there have been homosexuals within the US Military probably since 1775. But unless those folks did something blatant to expose themselves or endanger the service, they were largely ignored. Clinton opened a bag of worms and nearly tore the US Military apart at the time. All for the sake of a few votes.
Of course, it is not a secret that Hillary hates the military with a passion. Maybe it is because she recognizes that even though the President commands the military, they never really control them.
But now matter where a person goes, he will see politics in action. Whether it is a Union meeting, a Lodge meeting or even an Internet chat room. Cliques are formed and someone always feels left out. Sometimes the cliques are quiet, docile and unobtrusive. While other times they take control, and dominate. I have always considered the latter to be made up of folks whom are weak in spirit and without moral courage on their own. But in a group, they feel empowered. Bullies, if you wish for a better term.
So. What was the purpose of today’s tidbit of diatribe? You figure it out. I’m too tired to think on it.
20 Oct 03
Sapulpa, OK
Political Fear
Some aspects of politics are harder then others. Often a single person finds themselves at odds with people they call friends. And is this frame of thinking I am reminded of something I heard years ago.
“A friend understands the differences in his friends, where a good friend recognizes the differences and is not ashamed to point out when a friend is wrong.”
Now I have to admit I am ashamed of myself for not speaking my mind once I realized there was something I considered wrong. Remember, the phrase ‘I considered wrong’, cause this is always important in any relationship.
Even after 33 years of marriage I must recognize that there are things in which my bride and I shall never agree upon. But the good thing is that we can discuss those things without fear of bloodshed or sleeping alone. What does this have to do with these and other comments today? Not a thing except to fill some space and hopefully bring a few things into focus.
Now I have never understood why or how people develop intense hate of a candidate for public office. Especially one they have never had physical contact with. Where does those feelings come from? How do they develop into such an intensity, that you would think the candidate had kicked the persons dog or something more sinister.
My Bride and I had discussed this on several occasions, without coming to any specific conclusions worth discussing here. But one thread kept coming up which maybe, just maybe requires some examination.
Fear.
Yet we cannot seem to understand where the fear comes from. Why a person so fears another they become so intense they refuse to see reason. Or at least cannot see reason. But the reasons for such fears completely allude me.
Now I am aware just how much can change by the election of a single person, but also understand that things cannot change only by a single person. What we observed during the Clinton Administration was persons taking advantage of Clinton’s political beliefs and playing them for their own gains. We watched some things go from simple to confused. Political Correctness where a single individual could dictate actions over a large portion of this country.
Interesting note: Federal Laws pertaining to the building of Playgrounds with Federal Funds. One law requires specific safety substances around and under playground equipment for the protection of the children utilizing them. Hey, this is actually a great law. Accidents do happen on the playground, especially at swings and such, and a soft place to land can save a child from weeks of painful healing.
Another Federal Law requires that any Federally Funded activity be Handicapped Accessible. This puts it at odds with the Law mentioned above, because the substances specified for safety are such that a wheelchair cannot transverse to the swing or slide it is under and around. So what you have is a Playground with very few if any activities in which both the Handicapped and mobile child can use.
Now I am a firm believer in that every child should be able to enjoy a playground. But I think it is criminal to eliminate a single playground activity cause less then 10 percent of the local usage will be Handicapped. This puts things in a minority rule situation. This means it is possible that 99 kids cannot enjoy activities we did as children cause 1 child has the unfortunate situation of being Handicapped. This is not being Politically Correct, this is being criminally negligent by those we depend on protecting all of us.
Besides, Kids tend to take care of things. And unless the Handicapped child is a real jerk, other kids will find a way for him or her to enjoy the activities they may not be able to get right up next too. Also, let’s figure out what moron determined the wheel chair has to get close enough to a swing so the child can move from it to a swing. Did he also consider what will happen to the wheelchair afterwards? It sure cannot stay next to the swing or the child will find himself damaging it and himself fairly soon after the swing action starts. OH… wait… someone will move it out of the way. Yeah… and why couldn’t that same person carry the child to the swing in the first place?
OK… I’ve beat that about some. Just consider before you fire a shot at me, that I am a Grandparent. I’m not Politically Correct and don’t give me any ammunition to fire back at you.
Now, back to the reason why people hate so much again. Anyone have a thought on it? You do? Great, share it with us here. But consider this, I am not bashful in playing the Devil’s Advocate.
What worried me most about this past week’s election was not so much who won but the actions or reactions of those felt the election was not in their liking.
There are websites popping up all over the place claiming Bush stole this election also. Much in the same manner he was supposed to have stole the first one. Here is a thought. If anyone other then a Bush had been governor of Florida the first time around, then I doubt if the controversy would have been so intense over the outcome. But if you read enough websites you will find much of the same gibberish concerning the outcome of the Ohio results. Also the concern over electronic voting keeps popping up with people claiming Kerry had more votes but the electronic system kept deleting votes for him, thus giving Bush the election.
This goes back to the comments earlier in the year that is was Republicans who owned the companies that made the machines. Does it take into consideration that maybe not all of the employees were Republican? Just how many people do you have to threaten or bribe before you can keep a conspiracy quiet?
Give it a break people. We have watched aides to Congressmen and Senators leak out information for years. This does not discount the people within the various departments of government who has made sure documents best left in their desks get in the hands of the news people. Do you really think if someone sabotaged the election, it would not get out to ABC News?
So what are people so afraid of that they develop such a hatred for a specific person running for public office? Fear that their way of life will change forever? Certainly it will change. Even if their candidate wins, it can change in a manner which they never anticipated. Kind of reminds you of the old saying, “Be careful what your wish for; You may get it”.
Also came up the concept of guilt. A person may feel guilt about their life actions and feels that the public person they hate reminds them they are not the perfect person they would like to be. Ok… I’m keeping things simplistic, but then again, it has been way too many years since I was in my college Psychology and Sociology classes and since they were not in my actual major, hard to remember all the special terms and phrases they love to use to describe a persons or groups actions. I took an “A” in the classes, which was all that was important to me anyway.
What I would like for anyone reading this to do, is to set down and list exactly why the have such strong feelings. No need to list them as a comment to this, but for themselves. I seriously doubt anyone who stumbles on this blog is of the mental state they are not able to rationalize and reason through such feelings.
But here is something I have heard several times and read once or twice that I feel is important to understand. This is the concept of voting against one person instead of voting for the other. Make sense? Let me flesh it out some. A political pollster commented on television that according to his figures only 17% of the Kerry voters were actually voting for Kerry, where as the other 83% were voting against Bush. Now what kind of sense does that make to elect a President based purely on the dislike of one candidate? I mean I did not trust or like Kerry. I do not believe he was the man for the job, but I voted For Bush not Against Kerry. Now I do not agree with everything Bush believes in nor do I agree with all of his decisions and policies, but I do believe he is the man for the job at this time in our history. But that is just my opinion, which like anal orifices, everyone has one and they mostly stink.
And for those who receive notification of each publication I make, I apologize for not having the comment blanks available for responses. I am still learning this system and shall endeavor to insure the proper box is checked so if you desire to make a response directly to the Blog site you can.
8 November 2004
